Sources and verification
Check whether a passage supports the claim; keep gaps visible. [1]
Sources and verificationPrivate preview
Why RAIVA?
A decision needs a foundation.
For teams that must explain how an answer was reached. RAIVA connects company knowledge, sources and review steps within defined permissions. Assess that approach through a concrete document task.
In brief
A fluent answer is a starting point. A decision needs evidence you can inspect and a clear account of what was reviewed.
RAIVA is an evidence-based AI platform for company knowledge. The RAIVA descriptions cover documented product principles, not verified production availability. Confirm functions, integrations and access in a demo. Virtual Employees remain a future vision.
Compare the work that matters
Research scope
Separate supporting evidence from completeness of review. [1]
Research scopeStructured results
Traceable results with sources and review steps. [1]
Structured resultsPermissions
Work within access rights; verify enforcement in your scenario. [1]
PermissionsIllustrative evaluation scenario
Lindenhof: one lease, two versions
A lease states a fixed end in 2030. A 2nd amendment extends it to 2033 but is signed by the tenant only. A third file cannot be read. Ask each provider to show the relevant passages, the conflict, the unread file and the documents actually examined. No provider response is simulated here.
Six questions for your demoLindenhofIllustrative evaluation scenario
Lease
Lease end
2030
2nd amendment
Lease end
2033
Unreadable file—
Two passages. One conflict. An open review.
Which approach fits your work?
Evaluate RAIVA when your team must justify a company-specific decision through passages, review scope and traceable steps. Ask for proof using your acceptance criteria.
Request a demoPut Harvey on your shortlist for legal research, drafting and matter-based document review. Validate jurisdiction, licensed sources and current rollout with the provider.
Compare approachesPut Hebbia on your shortlist for repeated document comparisons and finance-oriented analysis. Have the provider demonstrate which parts use Matrix, Max and separately licensed data.
Compare approachesFor drafting, summarizing and everyday analysis, first evaluate the tools your team already uses. Test source links and review effort on a representative task.
Compare approachesEvidence Benchmark
A source alone is not enough. What matters is what it supports, which documents were reviewed and what remains unresolved.
Six questions for your demo
Take these questions into every provider conversation. Use the same documents and acceptance criteria.
Can I open the exact passage behind each material claim?
Which documents were searched, omitted or unreadable?
How are conflicting versions and missing evidence shown?
Can a reviewer reconstruct the inputs and steps behind an export?
What happens after source access is revoked, including in shared results?
Which edition, sources, limits, costs and setup steps does this workflow require?
Sources and scope
An editorial comparison of official documentation, not a hands-on product test or ranking. A source reference alone proves neither a claim nor a complete review. Undocumented behavior remains open; editions, configuration and rollout can change availability.
Checked:
Next step
Bring your question. Examine the evidence.
Use the contact form to request a demo with your task, source systems and review requirements. Availability, setup effort and commercial terms must be clarified individually.