RAIVA
Language
Request a demo
RAIVA

Talk to RAIVA

Your questions. A conversation with perspective.

Ready when you are

Conversation language
Speaking pace

Test locally before starting. No recording or upload.

Transcript

Your conversation will appear here.

Accessibility

Make RAIVA comfortable to read. Your preferences apply across the website.

Reading preview

Knowledge with a clear source.

Text size

Choose the text size that works for you.

Your operating system’s reduced-motion preference is always respected.

Private preview

Comparison

RAIVA vs. Hebbia

From document collections to a reviewable result. Compare Hebbia’s Matrix and Max with RAIVA’s documented evidence principles using the same source material.

In brief

Hebbia is more than a document chatbot: Matrix organizes analyses, while Max presents financial work products. Evaluate both product scope and traceability without assuming identical access or functionality.

RAIVA is an evidence-based AI platform for company knowledge. The RAIVA descriptions cover documented product principles, not verified production availability. Confirm functions, integrations and access in a demo. Virtual Employees remain a future vision.

Illustrative evaluation scenario

Lindenhof: one lease, two versions

A lease states a fixed end in 2030. A 2nd amendment extends it to 2033 but is signed by the tenant only. A third file cannot be read. Ask each provider to show the relevant passages, the conflict, the unread file and the documents actually examined. No provider response is simulated here.

Six questions for your demo
LindenhofIllustrative evaluation scenario
Lease

Lease end

2030
2nd amendment

Lease end

2033
Unreadable file

Two passages. One conflict. An open review.

Compare the work that matters

Six questions for your demo
Compare the work that matters
CriterionRAIVADocumented product principlesHebbiaMatrix / Max
Typical tasksCompany knowledge and document-based decisions. [1]Matrix: document analysis. Max: deal and finance work. [4] [5]
Company sourcesConnect information within defined workspaces; confirm each integration. [1]Matrix uses document sets; Max presents connected financial sources. [4] [5]
Sources and verificationCheck whether a passage supports the claim; keep gaps visible. [1]Matrix shows source documents; Max advertises cell-level model citations. [4] [5]
Research scopeSeparate supporting evidence from completeness of review. [1]Compare many documents; verify omissions and failed processing. [4] [5]
Structured resultsTraceable results with sources and review steps. [1]Matrix tables; Max financial models, decks and dashboards. [4] [5]
CollaborationHuman review within defined workspaces; confirm sharing behavior. [1]Max describes shareable presentations; confirm review handoffs. [5]
PermissionsWork within access rights; verify enforcement in your scenario. [1]Confirm access inheritance and revocation for each source. [4] [5]
Implementation effortAgree sources, responsibilities and acceptance criteria; effort remains open. [1]Confirm Matrix/Max access, data licenses and workflow setup. [4] [5]

Which approach fits your work?

Hebbia

Put Hebbia on your shortlist for repeated document comparisons and finance-oriented analysis. Have the provider demonstrate which parts use Matrix, Max and separately licensed data.

Compare approaches
RAIVA

Evaluate RAIVA when your team must justify a company-specific decision through passages, review scope and traceable steps. Ask for proof using your acceptance criteria.

Request a demo

Six questions for your demo

Take these questions into every provider conversation. Use the same documents and acceptance criteria.

  1. Can I open the exact passage behind each material claim?

  2. Which documents were searched, omitted or unreadable?

  3. How are conflicting versions and missing evidence shown?

  4. Can a reviewer reconstruct the inputs and steps behind an export?

  5. What happens after source access is revoked, including in shared results?

  6. Which edition, sources, limits, costs and setup steps does this workflow require?

Sources and scope

An editorial comparison of official documentation, not a hands-on product test or ranking. A source reference alone proves neither a claim nor a complete review. Undocumented behavior remains open; editions, configuration and rollout can change availability.

Checked:

Next step

Bring your question. Examine the evidence.

Use the contact form to request a demo with your task, source systems and review requirements. Availability, setup effort and commercial terms must be clarified individually.

Your privacy choices

Necessary functions are always active. With your permission, we store your language, display and speech speed (Comfort), or measure page views and interactions with browser recognition in PostHog, and page views in Vercel Web Analytics (Statistics). Optional services stay off until you agree. Your choice lasts 90 days; you can change or withdraw it here at any time. Voice conversations require separate consent.

Privacy notice

Stores only your consent choice and supports necessary website functions.

Saves language, accessibility display settings and speech speed on this device.

With Statistics consent, PostHog measures page views, visible headings and sections, reading depth, interactions and confirmed form outcomes. A random browser identifier recognises this browser until the current 90-day consent expires; a visit ends after 30 minutes of inactivity. Vercel receives page views only. No form values, search terms, filenames, media, transcripts, URL parameters or fragments are sent. No replay, automatic capture or person profiles.

No advertising providers or trackers are used.