“The lease is concluded for a fixed term ending on 31 December 2030.”
Lease · v1 · p. 8 · §12
Platform
Knowledge becomes accountable work.
RAIVA is an evidence-based AI platform for company knowledge. Connect information, examine claims and prepare results that people can review.
Question
Until when is the anchor tenant’s rent secured at Lindenhof?
Source ↗ Result
The lease fixes the term until 31 December 2030.
The starting point
The knowledge is there. The connections are missing.
The lease in the data room. The 2nd addendum in an inbox. The lease end in the rent roll. A reliable answer needs all three together – with their origin and their limits.
Scattered documents
LeaseLindenhof / v1
2nd addendumLindenhof / v2
Rent rollLindenhof / v1
CorrespondenceLindenhof / v1
A shared working context
- Documents have an origin.
- Claims need specific evidence.
- Changes call for comparison.
RAIVA connects research, source references and review within a defined workspace.
Illustrative source model
The platform as a whole
Four capabilities. One connected workflow.
Ingestion, evidence, traceability and access belong together. A result becomes useful for specialist work when you can assess its context.
RAIVAIllustrative example · fictional documents
Data Room Connector
Make documents usable
Prepare documents and information for research. Origin, version and open quality questions remain part of the context.
Documents → usable context
Explore this capabilityEvidence Engine
Connect claims to sources
See the relevant passage beside the claim. Examine what supports it and where a conflict or gap remains.
Claim → specific reference
Explore this capabilityAudit Trail
Understand how work developed
Consider the question, sources and review steps together. Hand over a result for specialist review.
Result → traceable path
Explore this capabilitySecurity
Bound the workspace
Selected sources, defined access and human responsibility set the boundaries of the work.
Task → permitted workspace
Explore this capabilityHow your team could work
One question. The full context beside it.
Follow a fictional acquisition case: from the lease through the supported claim to the addendum that the rent roll does not yet reflect. Each station shows a different part of the same work.
Illustrative example · fictional documents
Leasev1 / §12
Until when is the anchor tenant’s rent secured – and what supports the answer?
“The lease is concluded for a fixed term ending on 31 December 2030.”
Lease · v1 · p. 8 · §12
Result
The lease fixes the term until 31 December 2030.
SourceLease · v1 · p. 8 · §12
“The lease is concluded for a fixed term ending on 31 December 2030.”
Open review point
Check whether a later addendum changes the term or adds break options.
Examine evidence
A claim and its evidence must agree. The source connection makes the answer reviewable.
The applicable lease end remains unresolved.
Lease / v1“The lease is concluded for a fixed term ending on 31 December 2030.”
2nd addendum / v2Lease: “31 December 2030”. 2nd addendum: “31 December 2033”, break option effective 31 December 2031.
Open review point
The addendum is signed by the tenant only and the rent roll still shows 2030. Check whether the addendum is effective before it enters the WALT or the valuation.
Lease v1, p. 8 / 2nd addendum v2, p. 2
Trace the result
An addendum changes the context. Lease, addendum and rent roll give different end dates; the deviation stays visible until professional review resolves it.
Selected workspace
Property team
Permitted documents
- Lease
- Rent roll
Human responsibility
A specialist confirms whether the addendum is effective before the lease end enters the WALT.
Respect access boundaries
The task defines the scope. Only the documents listed here are accessible in this selected context.
From conversation to work product
More than an answer. A basis for the next decision.
A work product needs to be read, questioned and handed over. Supported claims, research scope and open points belong together.
Supported finding
What does the document say? The claim refers to a specific passage.
Visible review scope
Which documents were considered? The known collection is distinguished from missing information.
Open decision
What must a specialist still resolve? A conflict is not hidden behind a seemingly certain answer.
RAIVAExample work product
Lindenhof / working draft
Review note · Anchor tenant lease end
Result
The applicable lease end remains unresolved.
- Source
- Lease v1, p. 8 / 2nd addendum v2, p. 2
- Open review point
- The addendum is signed by the tenant only and the rent roll still shows 2030. Check whether the addendum is effective before it enters the WALT or the valuation.
Human responsibility
Review required
Review required
Specialist work, made concrete
A shared foundation. Different questions.
Start with your team’s task. These examples show how an evidence chain can be read in context; suitability and availability are clarified in discussion.
For the people behind the result
A shared foundation. Clear responsibility.
Specialist users, reviewers and IT ask different questions of the same platform. A useful deployment starts by bringing their perspectives together.
Specialist team
Ask the right question.
Define the task, relevant collection and expected work product.
Reviewer
Assess the claim.
Examine the passage, context, conflicts and remaining decisions.
IT & accountable owners
Set the boundaries.
Assess access, data processing, operations and required evidence before deployment.
Control belongs in the product
Clear boundaries. Including for your deployment assessment.
A product illustration cannot replace technical or legal review. Workspace, data processing and responsibilities must fit your specific deployment.
Defined workspace
LindenhofLease2nd addendum
Human responsibility
Other collections remain outside the selected context.
Access & scope
Who may use which sources for which task?
Processing & operations
What requirements apply to data storage, processing and the operating environment?
Evidence & responsibility
Which documents does IT need? Who reviews and approves specialist results?
A path to the right deployment
Begin with a specific task.
Introduction is tailored to your collection and requirements. One focused workflow provides a shared basis for further assessment.
Define the task
Agree the team, question, expected result and accountable owners.
Review the documents
Discuss sources, permissions, versions and quality in your actual collection.
Assess the workflow
Consider together whether source links, open points and review fit the specialist task.
Agree the scope
Clarify scope, operations, pricing and the next step individually.
A discussion guide for introduction, not a commitment to a fixed process or duration.
Product demo
See the platform. Through a task from your day.
A guided product demo walks through the path from choosing documents to reviewing a result, using a task from your day.
RAIVAWalkthrough in three chapters
From a question to a reviewable foundation
- 01Select documents
- 02Examine the claim
- 03Hand over the result
Before our first conversation
What else should you know?
How does source evidence differ from a complete review?
A source can support an individual claim. It does not establish that every relevant document has been found or reviewed. Source references and research scope are therefore considered separately.
Which documents and systems can we bring?
Documents, data rooms and existing information systems are possible source categories. Specific integrations, formats and access methods are clarified for your deployment.
What happens when information conflicts or is missing?
Such points should stay visible and be handed over to professional review. The examples deliberately show an addendum that was not countersigned and a missing lease.
Does RAIVA make the specialist decision?
The platform supports research and reviewable work products. Interpretation, specialist assessment and approval remain with the responsible people.
How do we assess operations, privacy and security?
Against your requirements and concrete evidence. The security page explains product principles; the Trust Center brings together further information.
How long does introduction take, and what does it cost?
That depends on the task, scope, documents and operating requirements. Pricing and timing are discussed individually; this page promises no fixed packages or deadlines.
Next step
Prepare your introduction
Scope, source quality and access rights are agreed before deployment. Pricing and implementation time are clarified individually.
Product principles, not a production or legal assurance.
Public positioning and illustrative examples. Individual deployment requires separate verification.
Connect information
A question starts with the right collection. The document, version and reference frame the research.