Data Room Connector
Contracts in a data room, discussions in an inbox, figures in spreadsheets: RAIVA connects company knowledge to its origin. Start where your essential information lives.
SharePoint
Slack
Google Drive
Microsoft Excel
Notion
Salesforce
From a collection to a reviewable basis.Source landscape
A useful connection starts with your task. Which systems contain the evidence, which add context — and which should stay outside the workspace?
Integrations we already offer or are currently building. We discuss any further integration with you and build it together.
SharePointGoogle Drive
OneDrive
Dropbox
Box
Amazon S3Contracts, appendices, assessments and project documents, including folder structure and versions.
When a review relies on a defined document collection. Select the relevant data room instead of combining every repository without review.
Microsoft TeamsSlack
Outlook
GmailQuestions, decisions and the context behind a change.
When a crucial addition sits outside the contract. Define the participants, period and approved channels.
Notion
Confluence
GitHubInternal policies, project knowledge and subject-matter explanations.
When a document needs the applicable rules to be understood. Distinguish drafts from approved guidance.
Microsoft Excel
Google SheetsFigures, reporting periods and the structure behind a metric.
When checking claims against a rent roll or cash-flow model. Keep the sheet, row, unit and reporting date in view.
Salesforce
HubSpotProperties, customer relationships and business records as context.
When documents need to be linked to a specific business process. Define the required fields and permitted data first.
Microsoft Word
Google Docs
PowerPointReports, templates and summaries.
When knowledge is shared in Office files. The tool represents a document source here, not a promised live connector.
Why connect
Another access point is of little use if the origin of a claim remains unclear. What matters is the relationship between source, version and question.
The original remains the reference. Extracted text needs a traceable connection to its document and source location.
An addendum may change an older contractual provision. Both documents need to be considered in the right business context.
An unreadable scan line or a missing appendix is an open question. It must not become seemingly certain information.
From original to context
Four steps frame the discussion about your data. The technical implementation depends on the source and use case.
Identify relevant projects, folders, periods and responsible people.
Make text, tables and document structure accessible; flag quality issues.
Bring origin, version and source location together with the business question.
Hand claims and open questions to subject-matter reviewers with their evidence.
Document types
Compare five illustrative document types. The original, extracted content and open quality questions remain readable side by side.
Illustrative example · fictional documents
“The lease is concluded for a fixed term ending on 31 December 2030.”
Lease · v1 · p. 8 · §12
Term clause § 12, page 8. Keep the link to later addenda.
Check whether a later addendum changes the term or adds break options.
Lease: “31 December 2030”. 2nd addendum: “31 December 2033”, break option effective 31 December 2031.
Lease v1, p. 8 / 2nd addendum v2, p. 2
Extends the term and adds a break option, page 2. Signed by the tenant only.
The addendum is signed by the tenant only and the rent roll still shows 2030. Check whether the addendum is effective before it enters the WALT or the valuation.
14 tenancies as of 30 June 2026. Keep row, unit and reporting date together.
Rent roll · v1
14 tenancies as of 30 June 2026. Keep row, unit and reporting date together.
Check whether a later addendum changes the term or adds break options.
The property manager reports the 2nd addendum as “signed and returned”. An email does not replace the countersigned copy.
Correspondence · v1
The property manager reports the 2nd addendum as “signed and returned”. An email does not replace the countersigned copy.
Check whether a later addendum changes the term or adds break options.
Stepped rent from 1 July 2026: “€[19,100?]”. Digit uncertain; check the original scan.
Scanned 1st addendum · v1
Stepped rent from 1 July 2026: “€[19,100?]”. Digit uncertain; check the original scan.
Stepped rent from 1 July 2026: “€[19,100?]”. Digit uncertain; check the original scan.
Use cases
Three situations show how a concrete task determines a useful selection of sources.
Lease + addenda + rent roll
Reconcile term and break options from the lease and its addenda with the rent roll.
Open question: Has the 2nd addendum been countersigned?
Data room + correspondence + addendum
Match the property manager’s email (“signed and returned”) against the addendum actually in the data room.
Open question: Is the countersigned copy on file?
Rent roll + leases + draft report
Bring WALT, rental income and findings together with their reporting date and source; name missing leases before handover.
Open question: Do the rent roll’s reporting date and the lease versions match?
Illustrative example · fictional documents
Versions
When a source changes, the claim derived from it deserves another look. Which rule an addendum replaces, which it adds and which continues to apply needs evidence clause by clause.
The 2nd addendum is signed by the tenant only. The rows marked “if effective” apply only once it is clear whether it was validly concluded. This example does not show an automated legal decision.
Illustrative example · fictional documents
Fixed until 31 December 2030 → extended until 31 December 2033. The later addendum prevails to the extent it is effective.
Lease v1 of 15 November 2020, p. 8 · 2nd addendum v2 of 12 May 2026, p. 2, § 1
One-off break as of 31 December 2031. The lease contains no such right.
2nd addendum v2 of 12 May 2026, p. 2, § 1
Stepped rent from 1 July 2026: “€[19,100?]” a month. The digit in the scan is uncertain; check the original scan.
1st addendum of 3 April 2023 (scan), p. 1
None of the addenda on file changes this provision.
Lease v1 of 15 November 2020, p. 5
Workspace
A broad system landscape calls for deliberate selection. Access, processing and professional responsibility belong in the same deployment plan.
Agree on the source system, project, folders and relevant data areas.
Clarify roles, permissions and required approvals for the use case.
Agree on updates, revoked access and the treatment of removed sources.
Plan your connection
Bring a concrete question and a representative set of documents. Together they form the basis for a useful starting point.
RAIVA / Data Room Connector
Connection scope, effort, pricing and timing are agreed individually. A logo on this page is not a commitment to availability.
Common questions
The selection illustrates possible source categories. It does not confirm a production integration. Interfaces, access rights and the required functionality are assessed for your system.
Start with a collection limited to your task. The information you need follows from that task and the permitted access boundaries.
Readability and completeness are part of the quality review. Uncertain text, missing appendices and unclear versions must remain visible as open issues.
Update methods, intervals and handling of changed or removed sources are defined for each connection. This page does not promise universal real-time synchronisation.
Next step
Scope, source quality and access rights are agreed before deployment. Pricing and implementation time are clarified individually.
Product principles, not a production or legal assurance.
Public positioning and illustrative examples. Individual deployment requires separate verification.
